![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|||||
|
February 13, 2006
Thousands Marched for Peace and the Rule of Law in the Horn of Africa in Washington, DC On 13 February 2006, around 10,000 Eritrean-Americans marched from the
White House to the Department of State in Washington, DC to urge the U.S.
government to ensure the enforcement of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary
Commission's (EEBC) "final and binding" decision to demarcate
the border between the two countries. Carrying banners with the slogans
"Demarcation Now!", "The Rule of Law Must be Respected",
and "Eritrea wants Peace!", these peace march participants reaffirmed
the EEBC's decision and role as the only just and legal option for peace
and stability in the region. The participants passionately called on the
U.S. government to uphold its legal and moral obligations as a witness
and guarantor to the Algiers Peace Agreements, and make sure that Ethiopia
abides by the EEBC's ruling without further delay or precondition. Eritrean-Americans of all ages, braved the weather and traveled from all over the East Coast, as well as the Midwest and West Coast, and were united in a spirit of enthusiasm and activism for this historic event. Eritrean-Canadians were also remarkably well-represented at the march. The youth in particular, helped to lead the masses in spirited chants and maintain the crowd's soaring energy and morale. The peaceful and colorful march was joined by several high-profile American
policy-makers and legal experts. Ambassador Donald Yamamoto, Deputy Assistant
Secretary of State for African Affairs, affirmed that the U.S. government
believes that the EEBC's decision should be upheld and that it will work
to ensure that implementation happens soon. Ambassador Yamamoto also commented
on the close relationship between Eritrea and the U.S. Ambassador Yamamoto was also presented with 22,000 signatures of concerned Eritrean-Americans and Friends of Eritrea, as well as signatories from all over the world, adding their voices to the thousands who are calling on the U.S. government to ensure immediate enforcement of the EEBC's ruling. Furthermore, delegations of Eritrean-Americans also met with their respective Congressional representatives and their staff members to convey their concerns and demand that the U.S. government guarantee strict implementation of the EEBC's decision to demarcate the border. Eritrean-North Americans stood together and spoke with one voice, demonstrating their solidarity with Eritrea and commitment to take action to fight for its people and interests. The peace march was a beautiful exhibition of pride and fervor and all who participated, whether in person or in signature, must be commended.
|
|||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|||
|
|
|||||
Eritreans take to the street to denounce UN ResolutionMeadna News
The demonstration started at just after 2.00 pm and continued until 6.00 pm. The demonstration was loud, angry but non-violent. Some of the banners read "We deplore UN Resolution”, "Demarcation Now", “Peace not War” and “Final and Binding”, The demonstrators expressed their frustration at the UN’s resolution
failure to address the underlining cause of the present crises, which
is Ethiopia’s refusal to accept a legally-binding border demarcation.
© Copyright www.meadna.com |
|||||
|
Eritreans in the UK to Stage Public Demonstration outside Downing Street on Monday, 12 December 2005 Action Group for Eritrea (AGE) London, UK, 05/12/2005
The protesters will be expressing their frustration at the way the United Nations is handling the Eritrean Ethiopian crisis. In its latest resolution (1640/2005), rather than addressing the real cause of the present crisis between Eritrea and Ethiopia, the UN Security Council has unscrupulously set a dangerous precedent in the Horn of Africa instead. In an overt abdication of its responsibility for maintaining peace and security, the Security Council has yet again failed to take firm measure against Ethiopia for rejecting a legal ruling enshrined in international rule of law. To date, Ethiopia’s unlawful behaviour has gone unchecked by the UN Security Council. Notwithstanding a catalogue of unlawful actions by the Ethiopian government, the UN Security Council has, rather surreally, threatened Eritrea with economic sanctions. It is alarming that the Security Council should fail to suggest any concrete punitive action against Ethiopia for its unlawful refusal to implement the final and binding EEBC ruling.
|
|
||||
|
In pictures: Eritrean peace rally
by meadna Monday, October. 24,
2004 |
|||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
A Call for Peace between Eritrea and Ethiopia |
||
|
Sanction needed against Ethiopia says The European Union Vice President of the Committee on Human Right |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Meadna News Speaking to thousands of Eritreans gathered in front of the European Parliament to protest Ethiopias refusal to accept an international ruling on the Eritrea-Ethiopia border, the European Union Vice President of the Committee on Human Right, Mr John Van Heck said; Ethiopia should implement now the final and binding decision, if not we need sanction against Ethiopia. Referring to the Algiers agreement that provides for enforcement action in the event of violation by any of the countries, he said; I am going to introduce a resolution this week urging the European Union Council and the Commission to impose the full range of political, diplomatic and economic methods on Ethiopia. |
||||||||||||||||
|
It has been three and half years since the Eritrea-Ethiopia Border Commission (EEBC) gave its final and binding verdict, but there has not been progress on the implementation of the decision, as Ethiopia continues to obstruct the demarcation of the boundary. |
||||||||||||||||
| Senait Haile who took part in the peace rally told Meadna We got very positive response from the EU. I hope the other guarantors of the peace agreement would come to their sense and force Ethiopia to accept the demarcation of the border. But I dont feel optimistic about the UN, because Koffi Annan, is once again barking on the wrong tree. | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
Background: Eritrea-Ethiopia Conflict
On May 14, 1998, Eritrea, asserting that a border dispute did not warrant an all out war, called for peace and expressed its commitment to resolve the border dispute through peaceful and legal means. The Ethiopian government however rejected all proposals for a peaceful settlement of the dispute. Thus, a bloody war that lasted for two years was fought between the two countries. As a result, tens of thousands of people died and much material destruction was sustained. |
||||||||||||||||
|
If Ethiopia is allowed to thwart
the Peace Agreement, development aid from the European Union can be used
to finance a war
|
||||||||||||||||
| Ethiopia is and
has been for many years the main beneficiary of EU aid, receiving on average
some €100 million annually. Additionally, the European Union has recently
granted Ethiopia €537 million in development aid. The current 5-year
development cooperation programme (2002-2007) provides €384.2 million for programmed aid and €153.7 million for unforeseen occurrences such as emergencies. This amount does not include the budgetary support as well as development and food aid Ethiopia receives from individual EU member countries. (Source: www.reliefweb.int) Ethiopia is the fourth biggest arms spending country in the world. Between 1998 and 2005, Ethiopia has spent about €3 billion just on buying arms. (Source: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute - SIPRI) While the Ethiopian government spends this amount, the ordinary people of Ethiopia find themselves in a dire situation as a result of recurrent famine. |
||||||||||||||||
| On June 18, 2000, following
a war that had lasted for two years, Eritrea and Ethiopia signed an agreement
to put an end to the fighting.
On December 12, 2000, a comprehensive peace agreement between Eritrea and Ethiopia was signed in Algiers. The agreement called on both countries to 'permanently terminate military hostilities' between each other. The European Union, along with the UN, AU and the US was co-signatory and guarantor of the Algiers Peace Agreement. The Peace Agreement, amongst other things, required the establishment of a neutral boundary commission to 'delimit and demarcate the border between Eritrea and Ethiopia and that the decision would be 'final and binding'. On April 13, 2002, a neutral boundary commission, the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC), reached its decision. In line with the decision, border demarcation was scheduled to take place in October 2003. Unfortunately however On September 19, 2003, the Ethiopian Prime Minister, Mr Meles Zenawi, in a letter to the United Nations Security Council, rejected the EEBC decision. His letter represented a material breach of the Algiers Peace Agreement and in effect, signalled Ethiopia's formal rejection of peace with Eritrea. On October 2, 2003, the UN Security Council, in a direct response to the Ethiopian Prime Minister's letter, reminded Ethiopia that it "had committed itself under the Algiers Agreement to accept the boundary decision as final and binding" and called upon the "government of Ethiopia to provide its full and prompt cooperation to the Boundary Commission." However, the Ethiopian government still remains intransigent and maintains that the Peace Agreement between Eritrea and Ethiopia is "null and void" The UN Security Council has issued many resolutions since. In all, the UNSC has called on Ethiopia to unequivocally accept the EEBC decision. In its latest resolution issued on 13 September 2003 (Resolution 1622 - 2005), the Security Council called on Ethiopia "to accept fully the decision of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission and to enable, without preconditions, the Commission to demarcate the border completely and promptly." |
||||||||||||||||